<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Valuation vs Tranfer Pricing</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=456</link>
    <description>Convergence is necessary because transfer pricing and customs valuation both seek to prevent revenue loss from related party international transactions, but differ in mandate: transfer pricing addresses potential over valuation for income tax, while customs valuation targets under valuation for customs duty. Demonstration of conformity with the Arm&#039;s Length Principle should resolve valuation conflicts, yet divergent statutory rules, methods (CUP/TVI/TVS, Resale Price/Deductive Value, Cost Plus/Computed Value), evidentiary standards and treatment of intangibles produce inconsistent outcomes and duplicate taxpayer burdens; administrative coordination and clearer rules could enable harmonisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:54:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=301003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Valuation vs Tranfer Pricing</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=456</link>
      <description>Convergence is necessary because transfer pricing and customs valuation both seek to prevent revenue loss from related party international transactions, but differ in mandate: transfer pricing addresses potential over valuation for income tax, while customs valuation targets under valuation for customs duty. Demonstration of conformity with the Arm&#039;s Length Principle should resolve valuation conflicts, yet divergent statutory rules, methods (CUP/TVI/TVS, Resale Price/Deductive Value, Cost Plus/Computed Value), evidentiary standards and treatment of intangibles produce inconsistent outcomes and duplicate taxpayer burdens; administrative coordination and clearer rules could enable harmonisation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 16:54:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>