<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PROSECUTION CANNOT BE CONTINUED WHEN PROCEEDINGS ARE DROPPED IN ADJUDICATION ORDER ON MERITS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=326</link>
    <description>Where departmental adjudication and criminal prosecution arise from the same facts, both may be initiated and proceed independently; departmental findings are not res judicata for criminal trials. However, if adjudication results in a clear merits-based exoneration that the alleged contravention did not occur and the criminal complaint rests on identical charges and facts, prosecution cannot continue. Technical or benefit-of-doubt exonerations or findings on different facts do not bar criminal proceedings. Departments must act reasonably and cannot withhold material in adjudication then pursue criminal charges after an adverse adjudicatory outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 06:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PROSECUTION CANNOT BE CONTINUED WHEN PROCEEDINGS ARE DROPPED IN ADJUDICATION ORDER ON MERITS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=326</link>
      <description>Where departmental adjudication and criminal prosecution arise from the same facts, both may be initiated and proceed independently; departmental findings are not res judicata for criminal trials. However, if adjudication results in a clear merits-based exoneration that the alleged contravention did not occur and the criminal complaint rests on identical charges and facts, prosecution cannot continue. Technical or benefit-of-doubt exonerations or findings on different facts do not bar criminal proceedings. Departments must act reasonably and cannot withhold material in adjudication then pursue criminal charges after an adverse adjudicatory outcome.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>