<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>THE SOCIAL FUNCTIONS TO ENTERTAIN THE EMPLOYEES CANNOT BE BROUGHT WITHIN THE AMBIT OF ACTIVITIES RELATING TO BUSINESS FOR AVAILING SERVICE TAX CREDIT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=244</link>
    <description>Expenses for employee entertainment, shamiyana and event photography do not qualify as input service under &quot;activities relating to business&quot; in Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules because the illustrative words introduced by &quot;such as&quot; invoke ejusdem generis and the listed examples are of a different genus. Procedural consequences include potential invocation of the larger period for undeclared items and recovery under Rules 14 and 15, while a demonstrable bona fide belief based on income-tax treatment may counter allegations of intention to evade provided show cause notices expressly allege willful suppression.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>THE SOCIAL FUNCTIONS TO ENTERTAIN THE EMPLOYEES CANNOT BE BROUGHT WITHIN THE AMBIT OF ACTIVITIES RELATING TO BUSINESS FOR AVAILING SERVICE TAX CREDIT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=244</link>
      <description>Expenses for employee entertainment, shamiyana and event photography do not qualify as input service under &quot;activities relating to business&quot; in Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules because the illustrative words introduced by &quot;such as&quot; invoke ejusdem generis and the listed examples are of a different genus. Procedural consequences include potential invocation of the larger period for undeclared items and recovery under Rules 14 and 15, while a demonstrable bona fide belief based on income-tax treatment may counter allegations of intention to evade provided show cause notices expressly allege willful suppression.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>