https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=215 Judicial interference in arbitral awards is narrowly confined: courts cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute their view for the arbitrator's, and may intervene only when a reasoned award rests on an unsound proposition of law or an error of law apparent on the face of the award (discoverable from the award or incorporated documents). The arbitrator must act within the contract and apply statutory legal positions; remittance or setting aside is limited to statutory grounds where illegality is evident from the award itself, not mere disagreement on facts. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:41:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=215 Judicial interference in arbitral awards is narrowly confined: courts cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute their view for the arbitrator's, and may intervene only when a reasoned award rests on an unsound proposition of law or an error of law apparent on the face of the award (discoverable from the award or incorporated documents). The arbitrator must act within the contract and apply statutory legal positions; remittance or setting aside is limited to statutory grounds where illegality is evident from the award itself, not mere disagreement on facts. Articles Other Topics Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=215