<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Depreciation: Hotel Building-Liberal Interpretation by Madras High Court (applicable till A.Y. 2002-03). And then uncertainty as to -how to claim depreciation in absence of specific rate of depreciation for hotel building.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=202</link>
    <description>Madras High Court treated the entire hotel complex, including ancillary counters and staff accommodation, as a single operational unit entitled to the higher depreciation category for buildings used as hotel. Removal of a specific hotel entry from the depreciation schedule after a later assessment year created uncertainty about whether hotel buildings fall within residential exclusions or general non residential rates, risking lower or contested depreciation claims. The author urges treating the hotel as a composite asset or as plant so buildings, furniture and equipment can be depreciated at appropriate business rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:18:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Depreciation: Hotel Building-Liberal Interpretation by Madras High Court (applicable till A.Y. 2002-03). And then uncertainty as to -how to claim depreciation in absence of specific rate of depreciation for hotel building.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=202</link>
      <description>Madras High Court treated the entire hotel complex, including ancillary counters and staff accommodation, as a single operational unit entitled to the higher depreciation category for buildings used as hotel. Removal of a specific hotel entry from the depreciation schedule after a later assessment year created uncertainty about whether hotel buildings fall within residential exclusions or general non residential rates, risking lower or contested depreciation claims. The author urges treating the hotel as a composite asset or as plant so buildings, furniture and equipment can be depreciated at appropriate business rates.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>