<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>New eligible plant and machinery- further deduction of 20% of cost u/s 31(1)(iia)- some issues and exploration of beneficial provisions- a discussion about need to amend the provisions to avoid litigation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=175</link>
    <description>The key operative contention is that the statutory further deduction for new eligible plant and machinery is a mandatory, one time investment incentive payable in the year of acquisition irrespective of the period of use and that it should not be deducted in computing the written down value of the block. A purposive reading resolves the tension between the granting clause and the proviso limiting first year allowances for short use, treating the proviso reference as a drafting anomaly; amendment is recommended to expressly exclude the additional allowance from reduction of WDV.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>New eligible plant and machinery- further deduction of 20% of cost u/s 31(1)(iia)- some issues and exploration of beneficial provisions- a discussion about need to amend the provisions to avoid litigation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=175</link>
      <description>The key operative contention is that the statutory further deduction for new eligible plant and machinery is a mandatory, one time investment incentive payable in the year of acquisition irrespective of the period of use and that it should not be deducted in computing the written down value of the block. A purposive reading resolves the tension between the granting clause and the proviso limiting first year allowances for short use, treating the proviso reference as a drafting anomaly; amendment is recommended to expressly exclude the additional allowance from reduction of WDV.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>