<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SECTION 50C HAS BEEN HELD VALID BY MADRAS HIGH COURT- however some vital contentions not raised by counsels- a fit case for appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=159</link>
    <description>The constitutional validity of the provision deeming sale consideration to a prescribed valuation benchmark was upheld based on Parliament&#039;s legislative competence and the provision&#039;s aim to prevent undervaluation and tax evasion. The author identifies omitted challenges: institutional bias in valuations by stamp authorities and departmental valuation officers; absence of statutory provision for independent or transaction-based valuation; denial of natural justice by limiting meaningful contestation; and unaddressed implications for transfers involving implied gifts, recommending further appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SECTION 50C HAS BEEN HELD VALID BY MADRAS HIGH COURT- however some vital contentions not raised by counsels- a fit case for appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=159</link>
      <description>The constitutional validity of the provision deeming sale consideration to a prescribed valuation benchmark was upheld based on Parliament&#039;s legislative competence and the provision&#039;s aim to prevent undervaluation and tax evasion. The author identifies omitted challenges: institutional bias in valuations by stamp authorities and departmental valuation officers; absence of statutory provision for independent or transaction-based valuation; denial of natural justice by limiting meaningful contestation; and unaddressed implications for transfers involving implied gifts, recommending further appeal.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>