<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service tax on rent of commercial premises -now the matter is before the Supreme therefore, here is an attempt to strengthen the case of landlords and to consider certain issues based on decision of the Supreme Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=151</link>
    <description>The article contests the validity of service tax on commercial rent, arguing that letting property is transfer of possession, not provision of services, and highlights a Bombay High Court interim order allowing landlords to file undertakings that prevent coercive recovery and require advance notice before transferring interests; it advises registration and provisional payment if levy is upheld and explains refund and CENVAT consequences pending final resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service tax on rent of commercial premises -now the matter is before the Supreme therefore, here is an attempt to strengthen the case of landlords and to consider certain issues based on decision of the Supreme Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=151</link>
      <description>The article contests the validity of service tax on commercial rent, arguing that letting property is transfer of possession, not provision of services, and highlights a Bombay High Court interim order allowing landlords to file undertakings that prevent coercive recovery and require advance notice before transferring interests; it advises registration and provisional payment if levy is upheld and explains refund and CENVAT consequences pending final resolution.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>