https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=78 The article contends that judicial directions limit the High Powered Committee on Disputes to either resolving disputes or granting clearance for litigation when it cannot resolve them, and therefore it lacks authority to refuse clearance to PSUs; it highlights procedural ambiguities about repeated clearance applications after appeals or remands, inconsistent denial practices and absence of monetary thresholds, notes increased denials deterring PSUs from seeking COD intervention, and urges clarification to protect shareholder and public interest. en-us Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:12:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=78 The article contends that judicial directions limit the High Powered Committee on Disputes to either resolving disputes or granting clearance for litigation when it cannot resolve them, and therefore it lacks authority to refuse clearance to PSUs; it highlights procedural ambiguities about repeated clearance applications after appeals or remands, inconsistent denial practices and absence of monetary thresholds, notes increased denials deterring PSUs from seeking COD intervention, and urges clarification to protect shareholder and public interest. Articles Central Excise Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=78