<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise disputes: Ignoring the common parlance test</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=54</link>
    <description>The common parlance test determines whether an item is excisable furniture: movable articles like tables, chairs and desks qualify as furniture and are excisable, whereas bespoke site fixed units that are ordinarily immovable or removable only by cannibalising are not furniture and are not classified as excisable goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise disputes: Ignoring the common parlance test</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=54</link>
      <description>The common parlance test determines whether an item is excisable furniture: movable articles like tables, chairs and desks qualify as furniture and are excisable, whereas bespoke site fixed units that are ordinarily immovable or removable only by cannibalising are not furniture and are not classified as excisable goods.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=54</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>