<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods Transport Operator Services – No confusion in the law – but why Mr. P Chidambaram’s army is so confused?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=50</link>
    <description>Recipients (consignor or consignee) liable for service tax under Section 68(2) are eligible for the abatement where the Goods Transport Operator does not avail Cenvat credit; administrative instructions denying this benefit were withdrawn and TRU confirmed that specified recipients may claim the abatement, yet revenue officers continue issuing show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods Transport Operator Services – No confusion in the law – but why Mr. P Chidambaram’s army is so confused?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=50</link>
      <description>Recipients (consignor or consignee) liable for service tax under Section 68(2) are eligible for the abatement where the Goods Transport Operator does not avail Cenvat credit; administrative instructions denying this benefit were withdrawn and TRU confirmed that specified recipients may claim the abatement, yet revenue officers continue issuing show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=50</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>