<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eye wash notice of Service Tax</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=30</link>
    <description>Notification No. 25 exempts certain accounting and company-secretarial professionals representing clients before statutory authorities, but yields inconsistent coverage because analogous services by lawyers remain exempt while like services by the listed professionals do not, producing service tax discrimination and raising questions about constitutional validity; the author also urges raising the general service-tax exemption threshold to a more realistic level.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eye wash notice of Service Tax</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=30</link>
      <description>Notification No. 25 exempts certain accounting and company-secretarial professionals representing clients before statutory authorities, but yields inconsistent coverage because analogous services by lawyers remain exempt while like services by the listed professionals do not, producing service tax discrimination and raising questions about constitutional validity; the author also urges raising the general service-tax exemption threshold to a more realistic level.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=30</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>