<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Request to Excuse 697-Day Delay; No Benefit from Section 14 of Limitation Act for Appellant.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14806</link>
    <description>Condonation of Delay – The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - The appeal was barred by limitation by 697 days, which had not been sufficiently explained by the appellant. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 11:43:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 11:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Request to Excuse 697-Day Delay; No Benefit from Section 14 of Limitation Act for Appellant.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14806</link>
      <description>Condonation of Delay – The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act - The appeal was barred by limitation by 697 days, which had not been sufficiently explained by the appellant. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 11:43:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>