<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Revenue&#039;s Impractical Interpretation of Rule 10 in CENVAT Credit Transfer Between Units.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14767</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit - transfer of credit - Rule 10 - transfer of second unit to the first unit - revenue argued that the factory as a whole need to be shifted. - This appears to be an absurd proposal and shall make the rule unworkable. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:23:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Revenue&#039;s Impractical Interpretation of Rule 10 in CENVAT Credit Transfer Between Units.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14767</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit - transfer of credit - Rule 10 - transfer of second unit to the first unit - revenue argued that the factory as a whole need to be shifted. - This appears to be an absurd proposal and shall make the rule unworkable. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:23:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>