<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Royalties or License Fees Must Be Prerequisites for Sale to Apply Rule 9(1)(e) in Import Valuation Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14549</link>
    <description>Assessable value - Royalties/licence fees were to be paid to the foreign supplier of the equipments - For application of Rule 9(1)(e) there had to be a finding that although termed as royalty/licence fee, the payment was made or was to be made as a condition prerequisite for the sale of the imported goods and was in fact not royalty/licence fee. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:47:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Royalties or License Fees Must Be Prerequisites for Sale to Apply Rule 9(1)(e) in Import Valuation Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14549</link>
      <description>Assessable value - Royalties/licence fees were to be paid to the foreign supplier of the equipments - For application of Rule 9(1)(e) there had to be a finding that although termed as royalty/licence fee, the payment was made or was to be made as a condition prerequisite for the sale of the imported goods and was in fact not royalty/licence fee. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:47:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>