<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>VAT Payment in Construction Doesn&#039;t Guarantee Accurate Material Valuation; Authorities Can Investigate Allocation Accuracy.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14477</link>
    <description>Construction Activities – Duty Liability - discharge of VAT on a particular value cannot be conclusive proof that the value of material involved corresponded to the value on which VAT was paid - Prima facie the service tax authorities have every right to look into the issue whether the value had been correctly split - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:16:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=300013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>VAT Payment in Construction Doesn&#039;t Guarantee Accurate Material Valuation; Authorities Can Investigate Allocation Accuracy.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14477</link>
      <description>Construction Activities – Duty Liability - discharge of VAT on a particular value cannot be conclusive proof that the value of material involved corresponded to the value on which VAT was paid - Prima facie the service tax authorities have every right to look into the issue whether the value had been correctly split - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:16:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>