<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported Goods Classification: Scrap vs. Machine Parts Debate Hinges on Condition at Import Time, Not Future Useability.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14386</link>
    <description>Import of goods - whether scrap or parts of machine - It was well settled law that the goods had to be assessed in the condition in which they were imported - Even if some of the rollers can be put to use after some re-conditioning - the said fact will not make the imported goods as rollers to be used as parts of the machine - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:56:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported Goods Classification: Scrap vs. Machine Parts Debate Hinges on Condition at Import Time, Not Future Useability.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14386</link>
      <description>Import of goods - whether scrap or parts of machine - It was well settled law that the goods had to be assessed in the condition in which they were imported - Even if some of the rollers can be put to use after some re-conditioning - the said fact will not make the imported goods as rollers to be used as parts of the machine - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:56:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>