<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Respondent Freezes Bank Account for Tax Dues Just 3 Days After Show Cause Notice, Violating 30-Day Response Period.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14343</link>
    <description>Defreezing Bank Account - since the petitioner is issued with a show cause notice dated 12.03.2013 extending 30 days time to file its explanation and therefore in the interregnum, the respondent was not justified in issuing the letter dated 15.03.2013, three days after issue of show cause notice to freeze the bank account of the petitioner for recovery of tax dues. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:10:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Respondent Freezes Bank Account for Tax Dues Just 3 Days After Show Cause Notice, Violating 30-Day Response Period.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14343</link>
      <description>Defreezing Bank Account - since the petitioner is issued with a show cause notice dated 12.03.2013 extending 30 days time to file its explanation and therefore in the interregnum, the respondent was not justified in issuing the letter dated 15.03.2013, three days after issue of show cause notice to freeze the bank account of the petitioner for recovery of tax dues. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:10:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>