<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Job Worker&#039;s Right to MODVAT Credit for Capital Goods, Aligns with Revenue Clarification on Ownership.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14279</link>
    <description>Entitlement of MODVAT Credit - Capital Goods - ownership - Credit availed by the Job Worker - there was no justification in the Department taking a diametrically opposite view - The clarificatory letter clearly indicated the intention of the Revenue to grant relief in respect of job worker and to the persons who obtained capital goods - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:15:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Job Worker&#039;s Right to MODVAT Credit for Capital Goods, Aligns with Revenue Clarification on Ownership.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14279</link>
      <description>Entitlement of MODVAT Credit - Capital Goods - ownership - Credit availed by the Job Worker - there was no justification in the Department taking a diametrically opposite view - The clarificatory letter clearly indicated the intention of the Revenue to grant relief in respect of job worker and to the persons who obtained capital goods - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:15:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>