<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exemption benefits upheld despite delayed declaration filing under Notifications 49/2003 and 50/2003 for Himachal Pradesh factory.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14264</link>
    <description>Area based exemption - NTF no.49/2003 and 50/2003 - delay in filing of declaration - such procedural lapse would not result in denial of the benefit of notifications no.49/2003 and 50/2003, when the respondent fulfilled all the basics, essential and requisite conditions of the notifications as regards the location of the factory being in Himachal Pradesh - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:47:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exemption benefits upheld despite delayed declaration filing under Notifications 49/2003 and 50/2003 for Himachal Pradesh factory.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14264</link>
      <description>Area based exemption - NTF no.49/2003 and 50/2003 - delay in filing of declaration - such procedural lapse would not result in denial of the benefit of notifications no.49/2003 and 50/2003, when the respondent fulfilled all the basics, essential and requisite conditions of the notifications as regards the location of the factory being in Himachal Pradesh - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:47:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>