<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Invoices Missing Buyer Addresses Insufficient to Prove &#039;Needle Fold&#039; Brand Clearances Violate SSI Exemption Requirements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14216</link>
    <description>SSI Exemption - Merely because the full address of the buyers in respect of cash sales were not given in the invoices, thus not making it possible for Revenue to conduct inquiries at their end, by itself cannot be held to be a strong evidence to hold that all those clearances were with the brand name of ‘needle fold’. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:18:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Invoices Missing Buyer Addresses Insufficient to Prove &#039;Needle Fold&#039; Brand Clearances Violate SSI Exemption Requirements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14216</link>
      <description>SSI Exemption - Merely because the full address of the buyers in respect of cash sales were not given in the invoices, thus not making it possible for Revenue to conduct inquiries at their end, by itself cannot be held to be a strong evidence to hold that all those clearances were with the brand name of ‘needle fold’. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:18:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=14216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>