<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Expenditure to Expand Business Line May Be Deductible u/s 37, Even if Partial Claim Made.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13940</link>
    <description>Once expenditure was of revenue nature and was incurred for expanding existing line of business it could have been allowed under Section 37 of the Act. - No doubt, assessee&#039;s claim was only for one-third of total outgo. - However, for this reason alone, a disallowance could not have been made - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:45:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Expenditure to Expand Business Line May Be Deductible u/s 37, Even if Partial Claim Made.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13940</link>
      <description>Once expenditure was of revenue nature and was incurred for expanding existing line of business it could have been allowed under Section 37 of the Act. - No doubt, assessee&#039;s claim was only for one-third of total outgo. - However, for this reason alone, a disallowance could not have been made - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:45:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>