<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Email Exchanges Block Company&#039;s Claim Defense in Winding Up Petition; Damages Plea Not Bona Fide.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13914</link>
    <description>Petition for winding up - The e-mails exchanged between the parties would foreclose the scope of the company to dispute any part of the claim. - Subsequent plea on damage could not be said to be a bona fide one. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:08:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Email Exchanges Block Company&#039;s Claim Defense in Winding Up Petition; Damages Plea Not Bona Fide.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13914</link>
      <description>Petition for winding up - The e-mails exchanged between the parties would foreclose the scope of the company to dispute any part of the claim. - Subsequent plea on damage could not be said to be a bona fide one. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 08:08:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>