<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Department&#039;s Extended Limitation Period Questioned; Officials Aware of Alleged Fraud at Appellants&#039; Factory.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13861</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - Apart from the fact that there was difference of opinion even in the Department, the fact remains that the department officials had been regularly visiting the factory of the appellants and were in the know of the process of manufacture adopted by the appellants and to state that the appellants had played fraud on the department is difficult to sustain. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:59:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Department&#039;s Extended Limitation Period Questioned; Officials Aware of Alleged Fraud at Appellants&#039; Factory.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13861</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - Apart from the fact that there was difference of opinion even in the Department, the fact remains that the department officials had been regularly visiting the factory of the appellants and were in the know of the process of manufacture adopted by the appellants and to state that the appellants had played fraud on the department is difficult to sustain. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:59:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>