<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Dubious Tax Deduction Claims u/s 271(1)(c), Assessees Subcontracted Work, Lacked Genuine Intent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13796</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Deduction u/s 80IA - Dubious and fanciful claims under the garb of interpretation, are a mere pretence and not bonafide - assessees had not carried out the work but had sub-contracted the same to a third party/parties - Levy of penalty confirmed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:26:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty for Dubious Tax Deduction Claims u/s 271(1)(c), Assessees Subcontracted Work, Lacked Genuine Intent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13796</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Deduction u/s 80IA - Dubious and fanciful claims under the garb of interpretation, are a mere pretence and not bonafide - assessees had not carried out the work but had sub-contracted the same to a third party/parties - Levy of penalty confirmed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:26:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>