<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules: Asset Sale Doesn&#039;t Equal Business Transfer; Appellant Not Successor to Defaulter&#039;s Business.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13788</link>
    <description>Recovery of duty from the successor of the defaulter - Though assets were sold, sale of assets by itself would not be transfer of business in whole or in part. - appellant is not successors in business or trade of Vaishnavi - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules: Asset Sale Doesn&#039;t Equal Business Transfer; Appellant Not Successor to Defaulter&#039;s Business.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13788</link>
      <description>Recovery of duty from the successor of the defaulter - Though assets were sold, sale of assets by itself would not be transfer of business in whole or in part. - appellant is not successors in business or trade of Vaishnavi - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:55:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>