<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Confirms Rebate Claim Validity; Filing Date u/s 11B Upheld Despite Initial Document Return.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13786</link>
    <description>Period of filing of rebate claim under Section 11B - Even though certain documents filed along with the rebate claim application had been returned to the petitioner, it cannot be said that the rebate claim application had not been filed on 5-11-2007. - date of shipment was made only on 23-12-2008 - rebate allowed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Confirms Rebate Claim Validity; Filing Date u/s 11B Upheld Despite Initial Document Return.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13786</link>
      <description>Period of filing of rebate claim under Section 11B - Even though certain documents filed along with the rebate claim application had been returned to the petitioner, it cannot be said that the rebate claim application had not been filed on 5-11-2007. - date of shipment was made only on 23-12-2008 - rebate allowed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>