<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitration Proceedings Infructuous After Disallowance Order Set Aside; Respondents Can&#039;t Continue Arbitration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13708</link>
    <description>Arbitration award - If respondents were entitled to invoke arbitration by virtue of Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of depreciation, respondents could have done so separately. Proceedings which had become infructuous by virtue of initial order of dis-allowance of depreciation having been set aside, such proceeding could not have been continued by respondents - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 09:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 09:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitration Proceedings Infructuous After Disallowance Order Set Aside; Respondents Can&#039;t Continue Arbitration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13708</link>
      <description>Arbitration award - If respondents were entitled to invoke arbitration by virtue of Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of depreciation, respondents could have done so separately. Proceedings which had become infructuous by virtue of initial order of dis-allowance of depreciation having been set aside, such proceeding could not have been continued by respondents - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 09:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>