<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Oversight: Ignored Section 50C(2) by Not Consulting District Valuation Officer for Asset Valuation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13689</link>
    <description>Valuation u/s 50C - Reference not made to DVO - Assessing Officer ought to have referred the valuation of the capital asset to the Valuation Officer, whereas, the authorities below referred to Section 50C(1) of the Act alone without adverting to Section 50C(2) - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=299226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Oversight: Ignored Section 50C(2) by Not Consulting District Valuation Officer for Asset Valuation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13689</link>
      <description>Valuation u/s 50C - Reference not made to DVO - Assessing Officer ought to have referred the valuation of the capital asset to the Valuation Officer, whereas, the authorities below referred to Section 50C(1) of the Act alone without adverting to Section 50C(2) - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>