<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Error: Incorrect Double Deduction u/s 43B Unrelated to Unpaid Excise Duty Claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13146</link>
    <description>As the valuation of stock is not part of the claim of excise duty remaining unpaid, it was misapplication of facts and figures in the mind of the AO to have discovered double deduction for the purpose of disallowance u/s 43B. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:53:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:53:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=298684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Error: Incorrect Double Deduction u/s 43B Unrelated to Unpaid Excise Duty Claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13146</link>
      <description>As the valuation of stock is not part of the claim of excise duty remaining unpaid, it was misapplication of facts and figures in the mind of the AO to have discovered double deduction for the purpose of disallowance u/s 43B. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:53:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=13146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>