<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Duty Exemption for Non-Compliance with 2001 Rules&#039; Actual User Condition.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12836</link>
    <description>Exemption notification - Concessional rate of duty - actual user condition - As the procedure set out in the 2001 Rules has not been followed, the appellant was not entitled to exemption - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:19:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=298375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Duty Exemption for Non-Compliance with 2001 Rules&#039; Actual User Condition.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12836</link>
      <description>Exemption notification - Concessional rate of duty - actual user condition - As the procedure set out in the 2001 Rules has not been followed, the appellant was not entitled to exemption - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:19:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>