<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Duty Abatement u/r 10 Not Denied Due to Lack of Time in Superintendent&#039;s Sealing Remarks.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12794</link>
    <description>Abatement of duty - Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Rules – Just because the Superintendent s remark regarding sealing does not mention the time of sealing, it cannot be presumed that on 4th April 2009 and 3rd July 2009, the factory had operated. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:39:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=298334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Duty Abatement u/r 10 Not Denied Due to Lack of Time in Superintendent&#039;s Sealing Remarks.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12794</link>
      <description>Abatement of duty - Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Rules – Just because the Superintendent s remark regarding sealing does not mention the time of sealing, it cannot be presumed that on 4th April 2009 and 3rd July 2009, the factory had operated. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:39:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>