<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise duty demand on seized goods overturned due to lack of evidence proving unpaid liability. Dealer&#039;s relief upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12546</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - demand on goods seized at the dealers’ premises is confirmed without adequately proving the case that there was excise duty liability to be discharged in respect of the goods and such liability was not paid - demand set aside. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:23:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=298086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise duty demand on seized goods overturned due to lack of evidence proving unpaid liability. Dealer&#039;s relief upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12546</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - demand on goods seized at the dealers’ premises is confirmed without adequately proving the case that there was excise duty liability to be discharged in respect of the goods and such liability was not paid - demand set aside. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:23:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=12546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>