<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interpretation of &quot;Commercial&quot; in Sections 65 (26), (27), and 65 (105) (zzzc) Crucial for Service Tax on Training Services.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6425</link>
    <description>Commercial Coaching or Training Services - prima facie view that the word “commercial“ in definitions at section 65 (26) and 65 (27) and 65 (105) (zzzc) cannot be considered to be superfluous and the explanation added by Finance Act, 2010 may not be a sufficient reason to take a view that the impugned training to be a “commercial training“ - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:02:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=296933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interpretation of &quot;Commercial&quot; in Sections 65 (26), (27), and 65 (105) (zzzc) Crucial for Service Tax on Training Services.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6425</link>
      <description>Commercial Coaching or Training Services - prima facie view that the word “commercial“ in definitions at section 65 (26) and 65 (27) and 65 (105) (zzzc) cannot be considered to be superfluous and the explanation added by Finance Act, 2010 may not be a sufficient reason to take a view that the impugned training to be a “commercial training“ - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:02:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>