<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Case: Refund Claim Denied Due to Unjust Enrichment; Price Uniformity Doesn&#039;t Prove Duty Burden Stayed with Seller.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6207</link>
    <description>Refund - unjust enrichment – uniformity in price before and after assessment does not lead to inevitable conclusion that incidence of duty has not been passed on to buyer as such uniformity may be due to various factors – refund claim rejected - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:15:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=296716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Case: Refund Claim Denied Due to Unjust Enrichment; Price Uniformity Doesn&#039;t Prove Duty Burden Stayed with Seller.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6207</link>
      <description>Refund - unjust enrichment – uniformity in price before and after assessment does not lead to inevitable conclusion that incidence of duty has not been passed on to buyer as such uniformity may be due to various factors – refund claim rejected - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:15:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>