<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds 5% Excise Duty on Coal from Coal India Ltd., Rejecting Petitioner&#039;s Claim of 1.03% Under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6120</link>
    <description>Petitioner challenged the levying of 5% excise duty with cess on the coal purchased by them from the Coal India Ltd. claiming that levying of such 5% of excise duty is illegal and instead ought to have been levied only 1.03% duty in terms of the Government of India’s Notification No. 1/2011-C.E., dated 1-3-2011 - decided against the petitioner - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:08:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=296630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds 5% Excise Duty on Coal from Coal India Ltd., Rejecting Petitioner&#039;s Claim of 1.03% Under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6120</link>
      <description>Petitioner challenged the levying of 5% excise duty with cess on the coal purchased by them from the Coal India Ltd. claiming that levying of such 5% of excise duty is illegal and instead ought to have been levied only 1.03% duty in terms of the Government of India’s Notification No. 1/2011-C.E., dated 1-3-2011 - decided against the petitioner - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:08:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>