<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Loss Due to Non-Issuance of Notices per C.B.E. &amp; C. Circular Post-March 2002; Department Held Accountable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6031</link>
    <description>Short levy of the duty - Since notices were not issued in terms of the C.B.E. &amp; C. circular even after 1-3-2002 within the normal period therefore the department had to be allowed to suffer for its revenue loss. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:28:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=296541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Loss Due to Non-Issuance of Notices per C.B.E. &amp; C. Circular Post-March 2002; Department Held Accountable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6031</link>
      <description>Short levy of the duty - Since notices were not issued in terms of the C.B.E. &amp; C. circular even after 1-3-2002 within the normal period therefore the department had to be allowed to suffer for its revenue loss. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:28:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=6031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>