<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supplier&#039;s 5% Shareholding in Importer Doesn&#039;t Automatically Make Them Related; Misinterpretation of Rule 2(2)(iv.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5976</link>
    <description>Transaction value - Related person – The interpretation given by the original authority would amount to re-writing of Rule 2(2)(iv) to read that if the supplier has more than 5% of the shares in the importing company, then both would be deemed to be related. There is no warrant in law to do so. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=296486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supplier&#039;s 5% Shareholding in Importer Doesn&#039;t Automatically Make Them Related; Misinterpretation of Rule 2(2)(iv.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5976</link>
      <description>Transaction value - Related person – The interpretation given by the original authority would amount to re-writing of Rule 2(2)(iv) to read that if the supplier has more than 5% of the shares in the importing company, then both would be deemed to be related. There is no warrant in law to do so. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>