<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Examines Proper Notification and Rebuttal Opportunity u/s 18(1)(c) of Wealth Tax Act Penalty Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5222</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 18(1)(c) of wealth tax act - Had the assessee been put to notice with respect to explanation(4) of section 18(1)(c) of the Act and consequently given opportunity to rebut the presumption, perhaps the situation would have been different. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:19:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=295738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Examines Proper Notification and Rebuttal Opportunity u/s 18(1)(c) of Wealth Tax Act Penalty Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5222</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 18(1)(c) of wealth tax act - Had the assessee been put to notice with respect to explanation(4) of section 18(1)(c) of the Act and consequently given opportunity to rebut the presumption, perhaps the situation would have been different. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:19:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=5222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>