<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interpretation of &quot;Include&quot; in Legislation Affects Cessation of Liability in Income Tax Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4703</link>
    <description>Remission or cessation of liability - The expression “include” is significant as Parliament did not use the expression “means”. Necessarily, even omission to pay, over a period of time, and the resultant benefit derived by the employer/assessee would therefore qualify as a cessation of liability, albeit by operation of law - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:05:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=295219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interpretation of &quot;Include&quot; in Legislation Affects Cessation of Liability in Income Tax Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4703</link>
      <description>Remission or cessation of liability - The expression “include” is significant as Parliament did not use the expression “means”. Necessarily, even omission to pay, over a period of time, and the resultant benefit derived by the employer/assessee would therefore qualify as a cessation of liability, albeit by operation of law - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:05:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>