<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SSI Exemption: Legal Interpretation Changes Don&#039;t Imply Wrongdoing in Brand Name Disclosure, Despite Grasim Industries Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4148</link>
    <description>SSI Exemption - brand name - as there are various decisions of Tribunal and Apex court against revenue, merely because, the Apex Court subsequently in the case of Grasim Industries Ltd(2005 (4) TMI 64 (SC)) ruled to the contrary, it could not be said that the assessee had suppressed material facts - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:23:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:23:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=294666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SSI Exemption: Legal Interpretation Changes Don&#039;t Imply Wrongdoing in Brand Name Disclosure, Despite Grasim Industries Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4148</link>
      <description>SSI Exemption - brand name - as there are various decisions of Tribunal and Apex court against revenue, merely because, the Apex Court subsequently in the case of Grasim Industries Ltd(2005 (4) TMI 64 (SC)) ruled to the contrary, it could not be said that the assessee had suppressed material facts - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:23:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=4148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>