<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Reviews Land Classification: Was 1986 Withdrawn Capital Rightly Treated as Agricultural Land and Individual Property?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3936</link>
    <description>Whether Tribunal was right in holding that the entire land introduced by the partners as their capital and later on withdrawn in the year 1986 was an agricultural land, treating it as individual property of the respective partners - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:42:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:42:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=294454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Reviews Land Classification: Was 1986 Withdrawn Capital Rightly Treated as Agricultural Land and Individual Property?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3936</link>
      <description>Whether Tribunal was right in holding that the entire land introduced by the partners as their capital and later on withdrawn in the year 1986 was an agricultural land, treating it as individual property of the respective partners - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:42:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>