<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Pre-Deposit Waiver: Revenue Neutrality vs. Notification Violation Post-April 2008; Referred to Third Member for Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3731</link>
    <description>Demand - Revenue neutral exercise - Whether the pre-deposit is to be waived on the basis of revenue neutrality assessed by Member (Judicial) or pre-deposit should be called for considering that express provisions of notification as in force after 01-04-08 has been violated as assessed by Member (Technical) - Difference of opinion - matter referred to third member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:45:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=294250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Pre-Deposit Waiver: Revenue Neutrality vs. Notification Violation Post-April 2008; Referred to Third Member for Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3731</link>
      <description>Demand - Revenue neutral exercise - Whether the pre-deposit is to be waived on the basis of revenue neutrality assessed by Member (Judicial) or pre-deposit should be called for considering that express provisions of notification as in force after 01-04-08 has been violated as assessed by Member (Technical) - Difference of opinion - matter referred to third member.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 08:45:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>