<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Rs. 1,78,562: Determining the Previous Year Liability Crystallized for Prior Period Adjustments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3519</link>
    <description>Disallowance of Rs.1,78,562 being prior period adjustments - The entire dispute thus hinges on the question as to the previous year in which liability to pay has crystallized and there is no dispute about admissibility of the claim per se - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:55:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=294040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Rs. 1,78,562: Determining the Previous Year Liability Crystallized for Prior Period Adjustments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3519</link>
      <description>Disallowance of Rs.1,78,562 being prior period adjustments - The entire dispute thus hinges on the question as to the previous year in which liability to pay has crystallized and there is no dispute about admissibility of the claim per se - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:55:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>