<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Application u/s 96(C) of Finance Act 1994 Questions Maintainability; Seeks to Avoid Conflicting CESTAT Rulings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3352</link>
    <description>Maintainability of application filed u/s 96(C) of the Finance Act, 1994 – subsidiary of a subsidiary of a Government company - If ruling is given in this case, it will bind only the applicants, this would mean CESTAT is free to render a ruling ignoring what is being ruled by this Authority. Such a situation should be avoided. - AAR</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:55:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=293885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Application u/s 96(C) of Finance Act 1994 Questions Maintainability; Seeks to Avoid Conflicting CESTAT Rulings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3352</link>
      <description>Maintainability of application filed u/s 96(C) of the Finance Act, 1994 – subsidiary of a subsidiary of a Government company - If ruling is given in this case, it will bind only the applicants, this would mean CESTAT is free to render a ruling ignoring what is being ruled by this Authority. Such a situation should be avoided. - AAR</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:55:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=3352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>