<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Clarifies Distinction Between Bad Debts and Provisions in Rural Banking Under Income Tax Act Section 36(1)(vii.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2989</link>
    <description>Bad debts versus Provisions for bad and doubtful debts - rural banking - Scope and ambit of the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) - provisions of Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are distinct and independent items of deduction and operate in their respective fields - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=293536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Clarifies Distinction Between Bad Debts and Provisions in Rural Banking Under Income Tax Act Section 36(1)(vii.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2989</link>
      <description>Bad debts versus Provisions for bad and doubtful debts - rural banking - Scope and ambit of the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) - provisions of Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are distinct and independent items of deduction and operate in their respective fields - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:26:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>