<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Orders Release of Detained Goods After Customs Misses Deadline for Notice u/s 124(a.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2829</link>
    <description>Whether continued detention of goods can be justified - This period of 6 months can be enlarged by the Commissioner of Customs by a further period of 6 months, by virtue of the proviso to Section 110 (2). Therefore, the respondents had time till 25/26.5.2011, which could have been extended upto 25/26.11.2011. But we are in December 2011. Till date no notice u/s 124 (a) has been issued. - Goods ordered to be released.... - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=293376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Orders Release of Detained Goods After Customs Misses Deadline for Notice u/s 124(a.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2829</link>
      <description>Whether continued detention of goods can be justified - This period of 6 months can be enlarged by the Commissioner of Customs by a further period of 6 months, by virtue of the proviso to Section 110 (2). Therefore, the respondents had time till 25/26.5.2011, which could have been extended upto 25/26.11.2011. But we are in December 2011. Till date no notice u/s 124 (a) has been issued. - Goods ordered to be released.... - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>