<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Royalty Payments as Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital; No Acquisition of Secret Processes or Trademarks Rights.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2312</link>
    <description>Royalty payment - Capital expenditure or not - The assessee acquired no right to any secret process or formulae or even any right title and interest in the trade marks and brands under which the IMFL products were sold. As a matter of fact assessee&#039;s rights were co-terminus with the subsistence of the said agreement. - held as revenue expenditure.... - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:24:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=292863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Royalty Payments as Revenue Expenditure, Not Capital; No Acquisition of Secret Processes or Trademarks Rights.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2312</link>
      <description>Royalty payment - Capital expenditure or not - The assessee acquired no right to any secret process or formulae or even any right title and interest in the trade marks and brands under which the IMFL products were sold. As a matter of fact assessee&#039;s rights were co-terminus with the subsistence of the said agreement. - held as revenue expenditure.... - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:24:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>