<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Confirms 25% Penalty Reduction Possible u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994, Despite Late Payment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2268</link>
    <description>Whether penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced to 25% by invoking the provisions of first proviso to Section 78, when the assessee has not paid 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days of the order as required under the second proviso to Section 78 ibid - Held yes.... - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:46:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=292819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Confirms 25% Penalty Reduction Possible u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994, Despite Late Payment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2268</link>
      <description>Whether penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be reduced to 25% by invoking the provisions of first proviso to Section 78, when the assessee has not paid 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days of the order as required under the second proviso to Section 78 ibid - Held yes.... - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:46:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=2268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>