<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes of the 47th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 22nd July 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=11909</link>
    <description>The Board granted, deferred or rejected multiple formal and in principle SEZ approvals, authorized non processing area operations with stated area/FAR constraints, and approved sector changes and land additions subject to contiguity and Development Commissioner certification. It adopted a co developer ring fencing policy requiring separate legal entities or, where not feasible, documented reasons, separate accounting for imports and domestic procurements, and prohibition on transfers of lease/service charges between developer and unit accounts. Extensions of validity and LoP were granted in specified cases; prohibited export proposals were refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=266138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Minutes of the 47th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 22nd July 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=11909</link>
      <description>The Board granted, deferred or rejected multiple formal and in principle SEZ approvals, authorized non processing area operations with stated area/FAR constraints, and approved sector changes and land additions subject to contiguity and Development Commissioner certification. It adopted a co developer ring fencing policy requiring separate legal entities or, where not feasible, documented reasons, separate accounting for imports and domestic procurements, and prohibition on transfers of lease/service charges between developer and unit accounts. Extensions of validity and LoP were granted in specified cases; prohibited export proposals were refused.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=11909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>